Social and System Integration: Lockwood, Habermas, Giddens
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Can Social Systems Be Autopoietic? Bhaskar and Giddens’ Social Theories
The theory of autopoiesis, that is systems that are self-producing or self-constructing, was originally developed to explain the particular nature of living as opposed to non-living entities. It was subsequently enlarged to encompass cognition and language leading to what is known as second-order cybernetics. However, as with earlier biological theories, many authors have tried to extend the do...
متن کاملComment on Lockwood
Michael Lockwood has, with his usual elegance and fluency, laid out a careful and accessible overview of Everett's ideas and some of the ways in which they have been developed, not least by himself. Although there are important areas of disagreement between us, there are a number of essential things on which we agree. The criticisms that follow, then, may give a misleading impression of the deb...
متن کاملSocial Integration and System Integration: Reconsidering the Classical Distinction
In a recent article in Sociology, Mouzelis argues that Lockwood’s distinction between system integration and social integration is, with some modifications, still to be retained because of its logical coherence and its methodological virtues. While its basic value is recognised, this article reconsiders the distinction in the light of some recent achievements in social theory. It is argued that...
متن کامل'The Cup of Kindness’? Dominant Social Norms and Muslims’ Social Integration in Scotland
Since the 9/11 bombings in New York, and the 7/7 bombings in London,Muslims’ integration in the UK has been under intense scrutiny. Muslimintegration, however, has long been a matter of debate in Britain, revolvingaround the maintenance of Muslims’ distinctive identity and practice. Forinstance, David Cameron (Cameron, 2011), Britain’s then Prime Minister,announced...
متن کاملThe Habermas-gadamer Debate
ly negated on the basis of a.false c.laim t.. o superiority. ~~ciallife-; the-symmetrkaJ..rc1atioll-betweenpartners in a game is a more apnnooer1 than that ofdoctor~patient.Everyone IS on relatively equal terms in the gallle..in that there are no privileged knowers. There is, however~anlmder lying consensus which expresses the ontological primacy of tradition and which is the condition of all ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Sociology
سال: 1997
ISSN: 0038-0385,1469-8684
DOI: 10.1177/0038038597031001008